Home / Business & Finance / Debate on Constitution (Amendment) Bill lasts more than six hours

Debate on Constitution (Amendment) Bill lasts more than six hours

KUALA LUMPUR, The debate on the Constitution (Amendment) Bill 2019 lasted more than six hours, receiving the support of Members of Parliament, who requested for a postponement to further scrutinise it.

Datuk Seri Anwar Ibrahim (PH-Port Dickson) said the amendment to Clause (2) Article 1 of the Federal Constitution was historic and meaningful to the people of this country, especially from Sabah and Sarawak.

However, he was surprised that certain parties questioned the Pakatan Harapan (PH) government’s efforts to restore the status of Sabah and Sarawak as equal partners with Peninsular Malaysia.

The matter (amendment) has been debated for a long time and we have heard the complaints and sadness of the people of Sabah and Sarawak. This move also confirms what our Independence fathers agreed on in 1963.

I don’t understand why this meaningful step is being disputed. Some say this move is ineffective but at least under PH, the prime minister (Tun Dr Mahathir Mohamad) has taken a meaningful step while BN (Barisan Nasional) never moved an inch even after half a century in power, he said to rapturous applause in the Dewan Rakyat.

The prime minister, when tabling the bill for second reading, said the amendment was the PH government’s first step towards realising the wishes of the people of Sabah and Sarawak.

Dr Mahathir said the move would restore Sabah and Sarawak’s status as equal partners of Peninsular Malaysia as stated in the Malaysia Agreement 1963 (MA63) during the formation of the country.

Datuk Seri Dr Ronald Kiandee (PH-Beluran) said the bill must be approved by the MPs, especially those from Sabah and Sarawak, as it had long been anticipated to lift the ranks of the two states.

For 43 years, Sabah and Sarawak’s equal ranks with Peninsular Malaysia was sidelined by the government…there were some efforts made by the previous government, which formed a Special Cabinet Committee to look into this.

But the best, the closest thing the previous government could do was to lower the power, a process called devolution of powers, and said that autonomy had been given to Sabah and Sarawak, but not to the level of amending Clause (2) Article 1 as being done by the present government, he said.

Opposition leader Datuk Seri Ismail Sabri Yaakob (BN-Bera) said the amendment to the Constitution was done in haste and should have been referred to the Parliamentary Select Committee for thorough discussion before tabling it in the Dewan Rakyat.

Datuk Seri Nancy Shukri (GPS-Batang Sadong) expressed support for the amendment, but recommended postponing it until after the Cabinet Committee’s negotiations to address the issue of MA63 to restore the privileges to Sabah and Sarawak.

Datuk Seri Ahmad Maslan (BN-Pontian), meanwhile, wanted the matter to be referred to Yang di-Pertuan Agong Al-Sultan Abdullah Ri’ayatuddin Al-Mustafa Billah Shah for consideration.

For such an important matter, it’s not always that the session amends the Constitution, so what’s wrong with bringing it to the attention of the Yang di-Pertuan Agong first he said.

The prime minister will wind up the debate.

Source: BERNAMA (News Agency)

Check Also

Court reject ECs petition on party-list calculation

BANGKOK, Thailand's Constitutional Court today rejected a petition by the country's Election Commission (EC) to determine the party-list seat allocation formula in the March 24 General Election.The Constitutional Court ruled 7-2 that it was the EC's re...